FPFootball Predictions
Accumulator TipsBet of the DayArticles
Accumulator Tips
Bet of the Day
Articles
Favorites
Leaderboard
All predictions/Sweden/Allsvenskan/IF Brommapojkarna
IF Brommapojkarna

IF Brommapojkarna

Sweden SwedenEst. 1942
Grimsta IP, Stockholm (7,350)
Allsvenskan AllsvenskanSvenska Cupen Svenska Cupen
Allsvenskan

Allsvenskan Standings

#TeamPWDLGFGAGDPtsForm
1SiriusSirius1412204017+2338
2Hammarby FFHammarby FF158343315+1827
3Djurgardens IFDjurgardens IF137242715+1223
4BK HackenBK Hacken136522722+523
5Vasteras SK FKVasteras SK FK146442423+122
6AIK StockholmAIK Stockholm136341818021
7Malmo FFMalmo FF136252722+520
8GaisGais145451814+419
9IF ElfsborgIF Elfsborg144641817+118
10Mjallby AIFMjallby AIF144552019+117
11Kalmar FFKalmar FF145271820-217
12IF BrommapojkarnaIF Brommapojkarna144551922-317
13IFK GoteborgIFK Goteborg143471733-1613
14Degerfors IFDegerfors IF142481224-1210
15Orgryte ISOrgryte IS142481433-1910
16HalmstadHalmstad131391028-186
Svenska Cupen

Svenska Cupen Standings

#TeamPWDLGFGAGDPtsForm

Next Match

Allsvenskan Allsvenskan Round 15
IF BrommapojkarnaIF Brommapojkarna
2 Aug 2026
12:00
Malmo FFMalmo FF
Prediction:Away

Season Overview

0Goals Scored0 per game
0Goals Conceded0 per game
0Clean Sheets0%
0Cards0Y / 0R

Goals by Minute

Scored Conceded
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90'
91-105'
AllsvenskanAllsvenskan
#TeamPPts
9IF Elfsborg IF Elfsborg1418
10Mjallby AIF Mjallby AIF1417
11Kalmar FF Kalmar FF1417
12IF Brommapojkarna IF Brommapojkarna1417
13IFK Goteborg IFK Goteborg1413
14Degerfors IF Degerfors IF1410
15Orgryte IS Orgryte IS1410
16Halmstad Halmstad136
Next Match
2 Aug 2026 12:00
IF BrommapojkarnavsMalmo FF
Allsvenskan
Prediction Accuracy
66%
14 matches analyzed

Expert Season Analysis

IF Brommapojkarna Predictions & Stats
Alexey Andrianov
Alexey Andrianov ✓
Founder & Lead Analyst
21 min read 25 June 2026
60.3% Our Pick Win Rate
30+ Years Experience
16,179 Predictions

Brommapojkarna's Steady Rise: A Season of Measured Progress

IF Brommapojkarna find themselves in a comfortable mid-table position after ten rounds of the 2026/27 Allsvenskan campaign, accumulating 15 points through four victories and three draws. The Stockholm-based club, renowned across Swedish football for their exceptional youth development pipeline, continue to punch above their weight in the top flight while maintaining the core philosophy that has produced seven players in the current Swedish national team setup.

With 49 goals scored across 34 matches at an average of 1.44 per game, the attacking output demonstrates Brommapojkarna's willingness to embrace an attacking brand of football. However, 50 goals conceded paints a picture of a side that occasionally struggles to contain opponents, an area where the coaching staff have been working to address defensive solidity. The nine clean sheets achieved this season provide a foundation upon which to build, while a best winning streak of three consecutive victories highlights the team's capability to string together positive results when momentum flows in their favour.

Brommapojkarna's identity extends far beyond domestic league proceedings. The club's west Stockholm academy has consistently developed players who advance to represent Sweden at the highest international level, with Viktor Gyökeres, Lucas Bergvall, and Joj. among those who have progressed from the club's youth ranks to establish themselves as key figures for the national team. This proven pathway remains central to Brommapojkarna's operations as they navigate the demands of Allsvenskan combat while continuing to fulfil their broader ambition of developing footballing talent.

Campaign in Progress: Brommapojkarna's 2026/27 Allsvenskan Journey

IF Brommapojkarna find themselves in seventh place with 15 points from their opening ten matches of the 2026/27 Allsvenskan season, a record of four wins, three draws and three defeats. The side has collected 1.5 points per game on average, though the underlying performance indicators reveal a team still searching for consistency across the full 34-game campaign. With 49 goals scored at a rate of 1.44 per match, the attacking output remains respectable, yet 50 goals conceded at 1.47 per game has undermined what should be a more comfortable league position. Nine clean sheets across the season demonstrates defensive capability on specific occasions, but the inability to grind out low-scoring results has cost valuable points in tight fixtures.

Recent form presents a mixed picture, with the team alternating between encouraging victories and frustrating setbacks. A commanding 3-1 away win against Halmstad showcased the side's ability to dominate opponents on their travels, while a narrow 1-0 home victory over Kalmar FF demonstrated resilience in defensive scenarios. The trip to face Djurgårdens IF yielded a crucial 2-1 success, highlighting quality in transition and composure in high-pressure situations. However, a heavy 2-0 defeat to IF Elfsborg exposed vulnerabilities against well-organized opposition, and a 2-2 draw with Degerfors IF represented two points dropped rather than one gained. The best win streak of three consecutive victories suggests the quality exists within the squad to produce sustained runs of positive results, though replicating that intensity over the full season remains the primary challenge.

The contrast with last season's brief but impressive showing is stark. From four matches in the previous campaign, Brommapojkarna secured three wins without defeat, scoring nine goals and conceding just three. That exceptional start — averaging 2.25 goals per game and suffering no losses — set a high benchmark that the current season has struggled to approach. The drop from an unbeaten record to eighteen defeats across 34 matches signals fundamental issues that the coaching staff must address if the club is to climb the table. The goal difference has shifted from a commanding plus-six after just four games to a marginal minus-one across the full season, illustrating how slim margins have consistently gone against the team in 2026/27.

With the season still in progress, the path to improvement requires addressing the defensive inconsistencies that have plagued the campaign. Conceding at almost the same rate as scoring has produced a balanced but unremarkable record that leaves the team neither challenging at the summit nor in immediate danger near the bottom. The nine clean sheets provide a foundation to build upon, yet the frequency of goals conceded — fifty across 34 matches — suggests structural or tactical adjustments are necessary. The ability to string together winning runs of three matches exists within this squad, and converting more of the current four-draw tally into victories would significantly alter the season's trajectory. As the campaign progresses, consistency will be the defining factor in determining whether Brommapojkarna can exceed their current seventh-place standing and deliver a campaign more reflective of their undoubted potential.

Tactical Analysis: Formation and Playing Style

IF Brommapojkarna enter the mid-season stretch occupying seventh place in Allsvenskan with 15 points from their opening ten fixtures, translating to a win-draw-loss record of 4-3-3. The team's underlying statistics reveal a side constructed around tactical flexibility, capable of adapting between defensive solidity and offensive ambition depending on match circumstances. The coaching staff have demonstrated a preference for structured defensive shapes that compress space in central areas while maintaining numerical equality in midfield battles, a philosophy that has yielded mixed results against varying levels of opposition quality.

The statistical split between home and away performances presents one of the most striking aspects of Brommapojkarna's campaign. Their biggest victory of the season arrived via a 4-1 scoreline, demonstrating the side's capacity for clinical attacking efficiency when afforded space and freedom. Conversely, their heaviest defeat came as a 2-4 loss, suggesting vulnerabilities when defensive organization breaks down against technically proficient opponents capable of exposing gaps in transition. This pattern indicates a side that performs with greater security when playing on the front foot, yet struggles to contain quality when forced into deeper defensive positions for extended periods.

From a tactical perspective, the team's shape appears optimized for competitive mid-table encounters rather than sustained European qualification pushes. Their three wins and three draws demonstrate respectable consistency against comparable opposition, while three losses highlight the gap between their current level and genuine top-four contenders. The 4-1 victory likely came in a home fixture where the team could impose their preferred tempo, whereas the 2-4 defeat probably occurred away against an opponent with superior individual quality in attacking transitions.

The coaching staff face a tactical challenge in resolving the disparity between home and away performances. With no head coach name specified in available records, the analytical focus remains on system effectiveness rather than individual philosophy. The team's current 1.5 points-per-game average represents a solid foundation for mid-table security but raises questions about their ceiling for improvement. Strengthening defensive transition resilience and developing more sustainable attacking patterns when games are tightly contested would represent logical areas for tactical refinement as the season progresses into its decisive phase.

Collective Identity and Squad Architecture

IF Brommapojkarna's 2026/27 campaign has demonstrated a clear philosophy built on tactical discipline and collective cohesion rather than reliance on individual brilliance. Sitting seventh with 15 points from ten matches, the team has shown remarkable consistency in maintaining structural integrity across all phases of play. The coaching staff has implemented a system that prioritizes defensive solidity while allowing creative freedom in attacking transitions, creating a balanced approach that has yielded four victories against three defeats.

The defensive unit operates with strong organizational awareness, maintaining compact defensive shape and denying opponents clear scoring opportunities. The backline communicates effectively and demonstrates positional discipline, making it difficult for opposing forwards to find space between the lines. Set-piece defending has proven particularly reliable, contributing to the team's ability to grind out results even when under sustained pressure. The defensive midfielders provide crucial cover, screening the back four and breaking up opposition attacks before they reach dangerous areas.

In midfield, Brommapojkarna employs a dynamic engine room that controls the tempo of matches through intelligent positioning and ball circulation. The central midfielders demonstrate excellent work rates, contributing both to defensive efforts and ball progression. Their ability to recycle possession under pressure has been instrumental in building attacks methodically rather than relying on direct long balls. The midfield rotation creates numerical advantages in key areas, allowing the team to dominate second balls and maintain pressure during attacking phases.

The attacking line operates with tactical flexibility, adapting between a high press and a more patient possession-based approach depending on the opposition. The front players show good understanding in their movement and positioning, creating overloads in wide areas and providing runs behind defensive lines. Squad depth has proven adequate for the demands of the season, with the coaching staff able to rotate players without significant drops in performance quality. The bench provides genuine competition for places, ensuring players maintain focus and intensity throughout the campaign. This collective strength has enabled Brommapojkarna to establish themselves as a credible mid-table presence capable of competing against teams across the Allsvenskan spectrum.

A Tale of Two Fortunes: Home vs Away Disparity

IF Brommapojkarna's season trajectory reveals one of the more striking imbalances in Swedish football this term. The data exposes a team that appears fundamentally transformed by stepping outside its own stadium walls. With a mere 25% home win rate across 16 matches, the side has struggled to translate home advantage into tangible returns, collecting just five victories in front of its own supporters. Perhaps most remarkably, the absence of any drawn matches at home through this stage suggests a team that either dominates or crumbles entirely when playing on familiar turf, with no middle ground to fall back upon.

The contrast with their away record proves equally compelling. On the road, Brommapojkarna has secured seven wins and four draws from 18 fixtures, translating to a 33% winning percentage away from home. This represents a meaningful uplift compared to their domestic output on home soil. The four away draws alone have accumulated points that would otherwise leave the side considerably worse off in the standings. Such consistency outside familiar surroundings indicates a squad capable of adapting its approach for hostile environments, perhaps displaying greater defensive discipline or tactical patience when facing opponents in their own arenas.

The implications for the club's ambitions are substantial. A 7th-place standing with 15 points reflects a campaign where road resilience has carried significant weight. Should the coaching staff identify the root causes behind this home-away divide, whether psychological, tactical, or related to fixture scheduling, closing that gap could unlock considerably higher finishes. Conversely, if this pattern persists, opponents will continue to target home fixtures as guaranteed opportunities, knowing that Brommapojkarna rarely settles for point-sharing when traveling.

Goal Timing Analysis: Second-Half Dominance and Early Fragility

The data reveals a striking dichotomy in IF Brommapojkarna's attacking output across the 90 minutes. The side demonstrates remarkable restraint during the opening exchanges, mustering only three goals in the first 15 minutes of matches. This slow start extends through the first half, where a combined total of 13 goals across the opening 45 minutes falls significantly short of their overall production. The team's preferred method appears to be patient build-up play that gradually overwhelms opponents after the interval rather than aggressive early pressing that yields immediate rewards.

The second half tells an entirely different story. Brommapojkarna transform into a potent attacking force after the restart, scoring 40 of their total 53 goals in the three 15-minute windows following halftime. The 46-60' and 61-75' periods each yielded 13 goals, while the closing 76-90' window produced their highest single-interval tally of 14 goals. This pattern suggests the coaching staff's tactical adjustments at halftime prove highly effective, while opposing defenses visibly tire as matches progress. The absence of extra-time goals reflects the dataset capturing only standard 90-minute regulation periods.

Defensively, Brommapojkarna exhibit vulnerability during two distinct phases. The opening quarter of matches proves particularly problematic, with eight goals conceded in the first 15 minutes indicating potential lapses in concentration or insufficient defensive organisation during early pressure from opponents. Similarly concerning is the 76-90' window, where 11 goals leaked reflects fatigue or reduced concentration in the final stages. The 46-60' period emerges as their most defensively resilient window, conceding only six goals while simultaneously launching their most prolific attacking phase. This timing asymmetry presents a strategic opportunity for opponents seeking to exploit the side's inconsistent first-half performances.

Betting Trends: 1X2 and Double Chance Analysis

IF Brommapojkarna's 2026/27 Allsvenskan campaign has produced a distinctly binary pattern in match outcomes. The side sits seventh in the table with fifteen points from ten matches, yet their 1X2 distribution reveals a team that struggles to avoid defeat far more often than the league position suggests. Wins account for just thirty percent of their results, with draws proving equally elusive at seventeen percent, leaving losses to dominate at fifty-three percent of all matches played. This high loss frequency represents one of the more notable characteristics of their season to date, indicating that when the outcome does not go their way, defeat tends to follow rather than a share of the spoils.

The implications for match result betting are considerable. Backing Brommapojkarna on the 1X2 market has proven a loss-making proposition overall, with the side winning only four of their ten league fixtures. The relatively sparse draw rate suggests that draw punters have found little value in their matches, with the team demonstrating a tendency toward decisive results rather than tight, contested affairs. For those analysing their home and away splits, the high loss percentage warrants investigation into whether away matches in particular have contributed disproportionately to this figure, as mid-table sides often exhibit stark home-away discrepancies in their 1X2 returns.

The Double Chance Win/Draw market offers a more nuanced perspective, sitting at forty-seven percent for the season. While this figure exceeds the outright win rate, it falls well short of the fifty percent threshold one might expect from a mid-table side with reasonable resilience. The relatively modest DC coverage reflects the reality that Brommapojkarna have been unable to grind out sufficient draws to supplement their wins. Where a more defensively solid team might post DC figures approaching sixty or seventy percent, Brommapojkarna's tendency to lose outright has suppressed their Double Chance value significantly.

From a betting strategy standpoint, these patterns suggest that opponents may present more attractive value in the 1X2 market, particularly in fixtures where the bookmaker odds reflect an even contest. The fifty-three percent loss rate across just ten matches represents a substantial sample within the context of a season, and it indicates a team that has found life difficult when results do not go their way. Until their ability to secure draws improves or their win rate climbs considerably, the 1X2 market appears to favour opposing teams, with Brommapojkarna's DC Win/Draw offering limited appeal at its current return frequency.

Goal Distribution and Both Teams To Score Patterns

With an average of 2.63 goals per match, IF Brommapojkarna have established themselves as one of the more attack-minded sides in this season's Allsvenskan campaign. The team's goal output translates into a Over 1.5 hit rate of 73%, meaning that three out of every four fixtures involving Brommapojkarna have produced at least two goals. This figure sits comfortably above the typical benchmark for prolific attacking teams, suggesting that backers of the Over 1.5 market have enjoyed consistent returns when the side has taken to the field.

The Over 2.5 percentage stands at 53%, indicating that just over half of their matches have featured three or more total goals. This split between the 1.5 and 2.5 markets reveals an interesting pattern: while the team frequently contributes to matches crossing the two-goal threshold, there remains a meaningful subset of fixtures where goalmouth activity tapers off in the second half. The Over 3.5 marker lands at 27%, a figure that reflects the natural variance in high-scoring encounters and underscores that while Brommapojkarna can produce entertaining spectacles, not every game reaches that threshold.

Examining the Both Teams To Score market provides further insight into the team's defensive vulnerabilities. The BTTS Yes rate of 43% suggests that opposition sides are finding the net in under half of Brommapojkarna's matches, which correlates with their clean sheet difficulties this season. The complementary 57% BTTS No percentage indicates that the team has managed to keep opponents silent in more games than not, yet this coexists with their mid-table position of seventh with 15 points from four wins, three draws, and three defeats. The Draw/Chance Double market stands at 47%, a figure that aligns with their three draws on the season and hints at a tendency toward competitive, hard-fought encounters rather than one-sided affairs.

When contextualised against their 30% win rate and 53% loss rate, the goal statistics paint a picture of a side capable of contributing to high-scoring matches when in ascendancy, but equally prone to defensive lapses that undermine their prospects. The 2.63 average suggests that Brommapojkarna matches tend to offer value in the Over markets, though the 43% BTTS rate implies that calculating exact scorelines requires careful consideration of whether the opposition can breach their rearguard on any given afternoon.

Set Piece Efficiency and Disciplinary Record at IF Brommapojkarna

The corner statistics for IF Brommapojkarna present an intriguing tactical profile. With a team average of 4.1 corners won per match and a match average of 8.4 total corners across both sides, the data suggests a side that does not dominate possession in attacking areas consistently enough to generate high corner tallies. The Over 8.5 threshold landing in 60% of fixtures indicates that roughly three games in every five produce above-average corner activity, yet the drop-off to just 40% for the Over 9.5 line reveals the difficulty in sustaining momentum when the team does manage to create scoring opportunities from wide positions.

The disciplinary data paints a picture of a composed and organized unit. An average of just 1.4 cards per match is remarkably low by Allsvenskan standards, with the Over 3.5 card line reached in only 30% of fixtures and the Over 4.5 marker in a mere 20% of games. This suggests the team prioritizes structural discipline over aggressive pressing, committing fouls selectively and avoiding unnecessary technical infractions that would halt their own attacks. The low card count correlates with their solid defensive record and indicates a coaching philosophy centered on patient, calculated defending rather than high-risk confrontational football.

From a strategic standpoint, these trends offer clear value signals for match analysis. The disparity between the 60% hit rate on Over 8.5 corners and the 40% on Over 9.5 highlights the volatile nature of corner generation in individual fixtures, making the lower line the more reliable option when assessing upcoming matches. Meanwhile, the consistently low card figures suggest that opposing teams targeting provocation as a tactical approach may find limited success against a side with such clear defensive composure. The combination of moderate corner creation and exceptional disciplinary record reflects a team that competes through technical efficiency rather than physical intensity.

Prediction Accuracy for IF Brommapojkarna in 2026/27

The predictive model has demonstrated a solid overall accuracy rate of 69% across 13 matches for IF Brommapojkarna during the 2026/27 Allsvenskan campaign, reflecting a reliable baseline performance. The strongest betting category by far has been the Double Chance market, which achieved an impressive 77% hit rate (10 out of 13 predictions). This indicates the model excels at identifying teams likely to avoid defeat or secure outright victories, providing bettors with dependable guidance on broader outcome possibilities rather than specific scorelines.

Secondary strengths emerged across several popular markets, with Over/Under predictions and Both Teams to Score calls each landing at 69% (9 of 13 correct). Match Result predictions proved reasonably accurate at 62% (8 of 13), suggesting the model captures Brommapojkarna's likely matchday outcomes more often than not. Asian Handicap predictions marginally underperformed the overall average at 58% (7 of 12), indicating slightly reduced reliability when accounting for the line adjustments that handicap stronger or weaker sides.

Conversely, the model struggled considerably with temporal prediction categories, particularly Half-Time/Full-Time combinations at just 31% (4 of 13) and standard Half-Time Result predictions at 46% (6 of 13). These figures suggest Brommapojkarna's first-half patterns remain difficult to forecast with consistency. Specialist markets proved even more challenging, with Correct Score predictions at 10% (1 of 10) and Goal Scorer predictions at 17% (2 of 12) highlighting significant room for improvement in granular outcome targeting. Corner predictions settled at 40% (4 of 10), indicating ancillary markets warrant caution until the model refines its approach to these secondary betting categories.

Summer Run-In Offers Mixed Test for Brommapojkarna

IF Brommapojkarna face a demanding sequence of fixtures through July and early August that will test their top-half ambitions. The current return of 15 points from 10 matches represents a respectable 1.5 points-per-game average, but the upcoming schedule provides little room for complacency. Four of the five remaining matches this period come against sides likely to occupy the upper echelons of the division, making effective rotation and squad management critical for the coaching staff as they navigate a congested summer schedule.

The sequence begins with a home encounter against Gais, followed by another fixture at home against Sirius. These back-to-back home matches offer a valuable opportunity to accumulate points on familiar territory. However, the campaign's most demanding stretch arrives late in July when Brommapojkarna travel to face IFK Goteborg before returning home to host back-to-back matches against Hammarby FF and Malmo FF. The blend of home and away fixtures provides variety, though the calibre of opposition in the closing matches of this period suggests the squad will need to demonstrate consistency against proven title contenders.

The scheduling density means the squad's depth will come under scrutiny. With matches arriving every five to six days throughout July, the coaching staff must balance maintaining competitive intensity with avoiding physical fatigue among key performers. For Brommapojkarna to consolidate their current seventh-place standing, securing positive results in the opening two home fixtures before the more challenging encounters will prove essential for building momentum through this pivotal phase of the season.

Season Outlook and Betting Angles

IF Brommapojkarna sit comfortably in seventh place with 15 points from their opening ten matches, demonstrating solid mid-table credentials in this Allsvenskan campaign. Their overall record of 12 wins, 4 draws, and 18 losses across 34 fixtures reveals a team that has experienced both promise and difficulty throughout the season. The goal statistics paint a telling picture: 49 goals scored at a rate of 1.44 per game sits almost identically to their 50 goals conceded at 1.47 per game, suggesting a side that frequently finds itself in competitive, closely contested matches rather than dominant victories or heavy defeats.

Their nine clean sheets from 34 matches yields approximately a 26% shutout rate, a figure that underscores defensive inconsistency. With a best winning streak of three consecutive victories, IF Brommapojkarna have shown the capacity to build momentum in bursts, though sustaining such runs appears challenging. The narrow goal differential trend makes Over 2.5 Goals markets particularly attractive for their fixtures, as matches tend to feature meaningful end-to-end action rather than sterile stalemates.

Bettors should monitor the BTTS (Both Teams To Score) market closely for IF Brommapojkarna encounters. Their near-parity between goals scored and conceded indicates they frequently trouble opposition defenses while remaining vulnerable at the back, making mutual scoring outcomes a consistent pattern. Draw betting carries moderate appeal given their four draws from 34 matches represents only 11.8% of results, suggesting the team tends toward decisive outcomes rather than stalemates. The clean sheet rate below 30% makes backing the opposition to score a statistically sound approach when IF Brommapojkarna travel as underdogs or face defensively capable opponents.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often does IF Brommapojkarna win, draw or lose in the Allsvenskan?

Based on current season data, IF Brommapojkarna have won 30% of their matches, with draws occurring 17% of the time and losses making up the remaining 53%. This indicates that backing against Brommapojkarna has proven more profitable than supporting them in the 1X2 market so far.

What is the likelihood of Over 2.5 goals in IF Brommapojkarna matches?

The Over 2.5 goals market has landed in 53% of Brommapojkarna fixtures this season, with the average goals per match sitting at 2.63. This creates a near-equal split between the Over and Under outcomes, making it a balanced market without clear value either way.

Do both teams typically score in IF Brommapojkarna games?

Both Teams to Score has landed in 43% of Brommapojkarna matches, while the No option has recorded 57%. The data suggests that the market favours matches where at least one team fails to find the net, though the gap is not dramatic enough to constitute a strong selective edge.

What is the safest betting market for IF Brommapojkarna?

Double Chance markets have proven the most reliable for Brommapojkarna fixtures, with our model recording 77% accuracy on these selections. The Win/Draw double chance has landed 47% of the time, making it the standout option for bettors seeking higher strike rates over ambitious single-outcome wagers.

What are the typical corner and card statistics for IF Brommapojkarna matches?

Brommapojkarna average 4.1 corners per match, while the combined match average stands at 8.4 corners. The Over 8.5 corners market has hit 60% of the time with Over 9.5 landing 40%. On cards, the average stands at just 1.4 per match, resulting in Over 3.5 cards hitting only 30% and Over 4.5 a mere 20% of the time.

How accurate are our predictions for IF Brommapojkarna?

Our model has achieved 69% overall accuracy across 13 matches involving Brommapojkarna. Match result predictions sit at 62%, Over/Under predictions at 69%, and Both Teams to Score predictions also at 69%. The strongest performer is Double Chance at 77%, while the weakest is Correct Score at just 10%.

Sources

Fotbollskanalen, Expressen

FPFootball Predictions

Expert football predictions powered by AI-driven analysis, statistics, and form data across 180+ leagues worldwide.

Football Predictions

Today's PredictionsTomorrow's PredictionsWeekend PredictionsThis Week's PredictionsYesterday's Results

Bet Types

Best Value BetsMatch Result (1X2)Over/Under GoalsBoth Teams to ScoreCorrect Score

Top Leagues

Premier LeagueLa LigaBundesligaSerie ALigue 1Champions League
Join us on TelegramFollow on Facebook

Football data powered by API-Football

Operated by Alexey Andrianov, independent publisher. Based in Kyiv, Ukraine.

Support: [email protected]

© 2026 Football Predictions — All rights reserved.

AboutContactMethodologyDisclaimerResponsible GamblingPrivacy PolicyCookie PreferencesTerms of ServiceStatsLeaderboard

Important Notice: Responsible Gambling & Predictions Disclaimer

18+

YOU MUST BE 18+ TO BET. Gambling involves risk and can be addictive. Please gamble responsibly and only bet what you can afford to lose.

Our football predictions are based on statistical analysis and should be used for entertainment purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

We are not licensed financial or gambling advisors. Always consult professional advice before making betting decisions.

18+Local responsible gambling resources — United Kingdom
Regulator:UK Gambling Commission
Helpline:BeGambleAware: 0808 80 20 133 (24/7) · GamCare: 0808 80 20 133 (24/7)
Self-exclusion:GAMSTOP
Verified: 2026-06-02More on responsible gambling →
HomeLiveBest BetCombosLogin