FPFootball Predictions
Accumulator TipsBet of the DayArticles
Accumulator Tips
Bet of the Day
Articles
Favorites
Leaderboard
All predictions/Croatia/HNL/NK Varazdin
NK Varazdin

NK Varazdin

Croatia CroatiaEst. 1932 4-2-3-1
Stadion Anđelko Herjavec, Varaždin (10,800)
UEFA Conference League UEFA Conference LeagueHNL HNL
UEFA Conference League

UEFA Conference League Standings

#TeamPWDLGFGAGDPtsForm
1AarhusAarhus00000000
2AjaxAjax00000000
3AtalantaAtalanta00000000
4Borac Banja LukaBorac Banja Luka00000000
5SC BragaSC Braga00000000
6BrannBrann00000000
7BrightonBrighton00000000
8FC CopenhagenFC Copenhagen00000000
9FK Crvena ZvezdaFK Crvena Zvezda00000000
10CSKA SofiaCSKA Sofia00000000
11Egnatia RrogozhinëEgnatia Rrogozhinë00000000
12SC FreiburgSC Freiburg00000000
13GentGent00000000
14GetafeGetafe00000000
15HNK Hajduk SplitHNK Hajduk Split00000000
16Heart Of MidlothianHeart Of Midlothian00000000
17FC Iberia 1999FC Iberia 199900000000
18Inter Club d'EscaldesInter Club d'Escaldes00000000
19FK JablonecFK Jablonec00000000
20Kairat AlmatyKairat Almaty00000000
21Kauno ŽalgirisKauno Žalgiris00000000
22KuPSKuPS00000000
23Lincoln Red Imps FCLincoln Red Imps FC00000000
24FC LuganoFC Lugano00000000
25FC MidtjyllandFC Midtjylland00000000
26Mjallby AIFMjallby AIF00000000
27MonacoMonaco00000000
28FC NordsjaellandFC Nordsjaelland00000000
29PafosPafos00000000
30PanathinaikosPanathinaikos00000000
31RigaRiga00000000
32St. TruidenSt. Truiden00000000
33FC ThunFC Thun00000000
34TrabzonsporTrabzonspor00000000
35TwenteTwente00000000
36Universitatea CraiovaUniversitatea Craiova00000000
HNL

HNL Standings

#TeamPWDLGFGAGDPtsForm
1Dinamo ZagrebDinamo Zagreb3627549328+6586
2HNK Hajduk SplitHNK Hajduk Split3620886136+2568
3NK VarazdinNK Varazdin36159124746+154
4HNK RijekaHNK Rijeka361411114936+1353
5NK Lokomotiva ZagrebNK Lokomotiva Zagreb361014124052-1244
6Istra 1961Istra 196136127173950-1143
7NK Slaven BelupoNK Slaven Belupo361011154661-1541
8HNK GoricaHNK Gorica36118174048-841
9NK OsijekNK Osijek36811172749-2235
10VukovarVukovar36610203773-3628

Season Overview

33Goals Scored1.32 per game
34Goals Conceded1.36 per game
5Clean Sheets20%
65Cards61Y / 4R

Goals by Minute

Scored Conceded
5
5
0-15'
7
9
16-30'
6
3
31-45'
4
8
46-60'
5
5
61-75'
6
4
76-90'
91-105'
HNLHNL
#TeamPPts
1Dinamo Zagreb Dinamo Zagreb3686
2HNK Hajduk Split HNK Hajduk Split3668
3NK Varazdin NK Varazdin3654
4HNK Rijeka HNK Rijeka3653
5NK Lokomotiva Zagreb NK Lokomotiva Zagreb3644
6Istra 1961 Istra 19613643
7NK Slaven Belupo NK Slaven Belupo3641
8HNK Gorica HNK Gorica3641
Prediction Accuracy
58%
18 matches analyzed

Expert Season Analysis

NK Varazdin Predictions & Stats
Alexey Andrianov
Alexey Andrianov ✓
Founder & Lead Analyst
12 min read 24 August 2026
60.3% Our Pick Win Rate
30+ Years Experience
16,179 Predictions

From Survival Specialists to European Contenders: NK Varazdin's Remarkable HNL Evolution

When NK Varazdin navigated just two Croatian top-flight encounters last season, claiming one victory and one defeat across a modest two-goal haul, few observers anticipated what the club would accomplish in their first full HNL campaign. The 2026/27 season delivered an emphatic answer, as Varazdin shattered expectations by clinching third place with 54 points, transforming from relegation battlers into European qualification contenders within the span of a single remarkable season.

The statistics tell a compelling story of resilience and tactical discipline. Across 25 matches, Varazdin claimed 11 victories, five draws, and nine defeats while scoring 33 goals at a rate of 1.32 per game. Their defensive record of 34 goals conceded, however, exposed vulnerabilities that ultimately prevented a genuine title assault. The backline managed only five clean sheets throughout the campaign, and the team never strung together more than one consecutive victory, suggesting a consistency problem that periodically undermined otherwise strong performances. Their goal difference of minus one highlighted the fine margins separating a transformative season from a merely respectable one.

What made Varazdin's third-place finish particularly impressive was the context of their campaign. A season-ending sequence of WWDLL demonstrated the team's inability to maintain momentum when pressure intensified, yet the overall body of work remained statistically superior to their inaugural HNL experience. The coaching staff successfully implemented a playing philosophy that generated chances while navigating the psychological challenges of competing against established Croatian powers week after week.

A Season of Steady Progress and Defensive Frustrations

NK Varazdin concluded the 2026/27 HNL campaign in third place, accumulating 54 points through fifteen victories, nine draws, and twelve defeats. It represented a campaign of genuine consolidation for a club that had previously operated in the lower reaches of Croatian football's top tier. The side demonstrated an ability to compete against the league's established powers, as evidenced by their impressive 2-1 victories over HNK Hajduk Split and their commanding 4-1 triumph over NK Slaven Belupo. However, the season was not without its complications, and a tally of 33 goals scored against 34 conceded told the story of a team that rarely dominated opponents for full ninety minutes.

The goal distribution data painted a picture of fragility at the back. With only five clean sheets across the entire league programme, the defensive unit struggled to provide the solid foundation upon which sustained success could be built. The concession rate of 1.36 goals per game proved particularly damaging in close encounters, where a single moment of lapsed concentration often resulted in dropped points. European competition also demanded attention, with the side competing in twenty-five matches across all tournaments, though the additional fixture burden undoubtedly contributed to the inconsistency that plagued their domestic form as the season progressed.

The form guide entering the campaign's final phase read WWDLL, a sequence that encapsulated the team's broader struggles with momentum. Remarkably, the best winning streak achieved throughout the entire season stood at just one match, highlighting an inability to string victories together when it mattered most. This pattern repeated itself throughout the campaign, with impressive results against top-six opposition frequently followed by disappointing outcomes against lower-placed teams. The side's character was never in question, but the mental fortitude required to maintain concentration across demanding fixture schedules eluded them for significant stretches.

When viewed against the previous season's limited sample, where the club had managed just two matches with a goal tally of two scored and three conceded, the 2026/27 term represented substantial progress. Third place in the HNL, coupled with the points total accumulated, established NK Varazdin as a legitimate force within Croatian football's elite division. The challenge now lies in building upon this foundation, addressing the defensive vulnerabilities that undermined otherwise creditable attacking play, and developing the consistency required to challenge for continental qualification places on a more regular basis.

Tactical Identity: The 4-2-3-1 Framework

NK Varazdin navigated the 2026/27 HNL campaign with a consistent 4-2-3-1 shape that reflected a balanced philosophy between defensive solidity and attacking intent. The system provided structural security through the double pivot, allowing the side to compete effectively against varied opposition approaches. This formation choice proved fundamental to securing third place, as the framework enabled flexibility in both defensive phases and transitional moments.

The team's home record illuminated a side that controlled proceedings on familiar soil, collecting 24 points from 12 matches through disciplined defensive work and clinical chance conversion. The 4-2-3-1 flourished in these conditions, with the midfield pair shielding the back four while the attacking trio operated with freedom between the lines. The contrast with away performances was stark — only 14 points gathered from 13 fixtures revealed vulnerabilities when navigating hostile environments and adapting to counter-attacking opponents who exploited wider spaces.

Strengths emerged in transitional play and set-piece efficiency, with the side demonstrating capacity to hurt opponents on the break through quick vertical passing. The double pivot provided numerical superiority in central zones, while the attacking midfielder in the hole offered creative linkage between midfield and the lone striker. Defensive organization represented another pillar, with the side remaining compact and difficult to break down when structured correctly.

Weaknesses centred on away-day resilience and goal-scoring consistency from open play, particularly against low-block defensive schemes. The ending sequence of WWDLL highlighted inconsistency that cost ground in the upper reaches of the table. Depth in the wide areas appeared stretched across the campaign, limiting tactical adjustments when leading or chasing games. Third place represented a respectable return, though the underlying numbers suggested a ceiling imposed by structural limitations in breaking down well-organized opponents.

Key Players and Squad Depth

NK Varazdin's third-place finish in the 2026/27 HNL season rested heavily on the attacking output of Ibrahima Mamut, whose 7 goals and 4 assists from just 19 appearances made him the most dangerous individual threat in the squad. His goal contribution rate translated to a direct involvement every 144 minutes of action, a remarkable return that compensated for a relatively modest goal tally across the league. The Senegalese forward led the line with pace and intelligent movement, giving the coaching staff a reliable focal point in the final third despite facing defensive pressure week after week. His influence extended beyond mere statistics, drawing attention away from supporting attackers and creating space for teammates to exploit.

Luka Mamic emerged as a productive secondary option in the forward line, netting 5 goals across 14 starts at an average of a goal every 114 minutes. His movement inside the penalty area complemented Mamut's wider positioning, allowing the team to rotate shapes and keep opposition defenders uncertain. Mamic's contribution was particularly valuable given the inconsistent minutes he received throughout the campaign, as the squad's rotation policy demanded readiness from players coming off the bench. In contrast, Marko Vuk managed only a single goal from 16 appearances, suggesting the forward struggled to maintain the consistency required to solidify a starting berth.

The midfield functioned as the engine room of Varazdin's campaign, with Adrian Latković orchestrating play across 20 matches and contributing 4 goals alongside 4 assists. His even split between goals and assists demonstrated versatility in both defensive and attacking phases, allowing the side to transition quickly when counter-attacking opportunities arose. Tomislav Duvnjak provided industry and tactical discipline from 18 appearances, though his single goal and assist reflected a more conservative role in protecting the back four. Marin Marina offered further depth in the centre of the park across 17 outings, providing the defensive cover necessary during difficult away fixtures against stronger opponents.

At the back, Luka Škaričić stood out among the defenders with 2 goals from 16 appearances, an unusual attacking output for a centre-back that proved valuable during set-piece situations and late-game scenarios when pushing for results. Antonio Borsic anchored the defensive line across 18 matches with his solitary assist highlighting his primary focus on organisational duties rather than creative contributions. Lansana Ba completed 15 appearances as a solid presence at full-back, offering reliability without flourishes in the final third. The squad demonstrated reasonable depth across all areas, with rotation between these players maintaining competitiveness throughout the season and enabling Varazdin to sustain their challenge for European qualification spots until the campaign's conclusion.

The Fort At Home, The Struggle Away

NK Varazdin's 2026/27 season revealed one of the more pronounced home-away disparities in the Croatian HNL campaign. At home, in front of their own supporters, the team transformed into a formidable outfit, winning seven of their twelve encounters and suffering only two defeats on their own patch. That 59% home win rate painted the picture of a side that knew precisely how to impose itself when playing in familiar surroundings, where the energy from the stands translated into tangible results on the pitch.

However, the narrative shifted dramatically when the team packed its bags and headed on the road. Across thirteen away fixtures, Varazdin managed a meagre four victories, translating to just a 32% win rate. The inability to consistently pick up points away from home represented a significant drag on their overall standing. Seven defeats away from home highlighted defensive vulnerabilities and an inability to control matches in hostile environments. Where they defended resolutely and attacked with purpose in front of their own crowd, they too often found themselves exposed and toothless when the atmosphere turned against them.

The 27 points accumulated at home accounted for a substantial proportion of their final 54-point tally, demonstrating just how reliant the side had become on their fortress-like home performances. This home-heavy points distribution explained much about their third-place finish. Had Varazdin managed to translate even a fraction more of their home resilience onto the road, they would have posed a far more serious threat to the teams above them. The gap between their domestic and away identities ultimately defined their season, marking home comfort as both their greatest strength and away fragility as their most obvious limitation.

Clinical in Bursts but Exposed in Transition Phases

NK Varazdin's goal timing data for the 2026/27 HNL campaign revealed a side capable of punishing opponents in specific windows, yet one that displayed concerning structural vulnerabilities at particular moments of each half. The team finished with 33 goals scored and 34 conceded across 36 matches, and the distribution of those strikes painted a telling picture of a side that operated most effectively when able to impose its rhythm early in sequences rather than sustaining pressure throughout entire 45-minute periods.

The most striking feature of their attacking output was the concentration of goals between the 16th and 30th minute marks, a period that yielded seven goals — their highest across any 15-minute segment. This suggested a side that grew into matches and exploited opponents who perhaps failed to respect the early threat. The closing stages of the first half, specifically the 31-45 minute window, also proved productive with six goals, complementing a relatively solid defensive record of just three goals conceded in that same period. The team demonstrated a clear ability to finish halves strongly, though the opening exchanges offered far less promise.

Defensively, the data exposed two critical weakness zones that proved costly throughout the season. The 16-30 minute window was particularly problematic, with Varazdin shipping nine goals — their worst return across any phase — despite also being their most prolific scoring period in attack. Even more alarming was the 46-60 minute window, which produced eight goals conceded alongside just four scored. This mid-second-half lull suggested conditioning or tactical adjustment issues that opponents exploited ruthlessly. By contrast, the 76-90 minute period reflected considerable character, with six goals scored and only four conceded — evidence of a side that refused to surrender initiative even when results were no longer in doubt. The absence of any goals in added time at either end of matches indicated a team that largely managed its energy output efficiently, neither chasing desperately nor coasting passively in stoppage periods.

NK Varazdin's 2026/27 Season: Decoding the 1X2 and Double Chance Markets

The 2026/27 Croatian HNL campaign delivered a fascinating betting narrative for NK Varazdin, whose third-place finish on 54 points reflected a team that proved remarkably reliable in the match result markets. With a 1X2 breakdown of Win 45%, Draw 20%, and Loss 34%, the club demonstrated a clear identity: they were a side that typically resolved fixtures decisively rather than settling for point-sharing. That sub-25% draw rate stands out notably in a league context where many matches tend toward stalemate, suggesting Varazdin's tactical approach actively pushed for resolution one way or another.

The winning percentage of 45% translates to fifteen victories across thirty-six league appearances, a conversion rate that positioned the club comfortably in the upper half of the table throughout the season. What makes this figure particularly significant from a betting perspective is the consistency beneath it. The side did not rely on explosive runs of form to inflate their win column; rather, they accumulated victories steadily across different phases of the campaign. Their late-season sequence of WWDDL demonstrated that the team maintained its competitive edge through the run of fixtures, with the winning habit remaining intact even as the schedule concluded.

The Double Chance market told an equally compelling story. With Win/Draw selections landing at 66% across the season, backing Varazdin to avoid defeat proved a profitable strategy for those tracking this market. The mathematics are straightforward: combining the 45% outright win rate with the 20% draw frequency produces that 65% baseline, which the data confirms. For punters, this meant that when the team entered matches with reasonable expectation of at least avoiding defeat, the outcomes rarely deviated from pattern. The 34% loss rate represented the minority outcome, and notably, those defeats tended to arrive in clusters or specific contexts that were identifiable through form analysis.

The 1X2 splits reveal a side that competed with genuine ambition against all opponents rather than adopting a purely defensive posture. A 45% win rate with only a 20% draw rate indicates proactive football that sought three points rather than settling for one. For the Double Chance market specifically, this profile makes Varazdin an interesting case study: they were neither invincible favorites nor chronic underdogs. Instead, they occupied a middle ground where backing them to avoid defeat offered value precisely because the outright win remained plausible enough to avoid heavy odds compression. The 2026/27 season demonstrated that understanding a team's fundamental approach to results resolution, rather than simply backing form blindly, unlocked genuine edge in the HNL betting markets.

FPFootball Predictions

Expert football predictions powered by AI-driven analysis, statistics, and form data across 180+ leagues worldwide.

Football Predictions

Today's PredictionsTomorrow's PredictionsWeekend PredictionsThis Week's PredictionsYesterday's Results

Bet Types

Best Value BetsMatch Result (1X2)Over/Under GoalsBoth Teams to ScoreCorrect Score

Top Leagues

Premier LeagueLa LigaBundesligaSerie ALigue 1Champions League
Join us on TelegramFollow on Facebook

Football data powered by API-Football

Operated by Alexey Andrianov, independent publisher. Based in Kyiv, Ukraine.

Support: [email protected]

© 2026 Football Predictions — All rights reserved.

AboutContactMethodologyDisclaimerResponsible GamblingPrivacy PolicyCookie PreferencesTerms of ServiceStatsLeaderboard

Important Notice: Responsible Gambling & Predictions Disclaimer

18+

YOU MUST BE 18+ TO BET. Gambling involves risk and can be addictive. Please gamble responsibly and only bet what you can afford to lose.

Our football predictions are based on statistical analysis and should be used for entertainment purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

We are not licensed financial or gambling advisors. Always consult professional advice before making betting decisions.

18+Local responsible gambling resources — United Kingdom
Regulator:UK Gambling Commission
Helpline:BeGambleAware: 0808 80 20 133 (24/7) · GamCare: 0808 80 20 133 (24/7)
Self-exclusion:GAMSTOP
Verified: 2026-06-02More on responsible gambling →
HomeLiveBest BetCombosLogin