Expert analysis is being prepared
Our expert is currently reviewing the latest stats, form and odds for this match. The full analysis will be available shortly.
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 31 | 11 | +20 | 33 | |
| 2 |
|
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 39 | 28 | +11 | 31 | |
| 3 |
|
14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 16 | +11 | 26 | |
| 4 |
|
14 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 18 | +4 | 25 | |
| 5 |
|
15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 25 | 32 | -7 | 22 | |
| 6 |
|
15 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 24 | 23 | +1 | 21 | |
| 7 |
|
15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 36 | 37 | -1 | 20 | |
| 8 |
|
15 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 25 | 21 | +4 | 19 | |
| 9 |
|
15 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 21 | 25 | -4 | 18 | |
| 10 |
|
15 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 23 | -2 | 16 | |
| 11 |
|
14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 31 | -9 | 14 | |
| 12 |
|
15 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 23 | 44 | -21 | 14 | |
| 13 |
|
14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 22 | 29 | -7 | 14 | |
| 14 |
|
14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 14 | 23 | -9 | 11 | |
| 15 |
|
15 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 18 | 30 | -12 | 7 | |
| 1 |
|
14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 34 | 12 | +22 | 32 | |
| 2 |
|
15 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 34 | 15 | +19 | 32 | |
| 3 |
|
14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 26 | 19 | +7 | 26 | |
| 4 |
|
15 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 30 | 22 | +8 | 25 | |
| 5 |
|
15 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 17 | +7 | 24 | |
| 6 |
|
13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 11 | +6 | 24 | |
| 7 |
|
14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 19 | 23 | -4 | 22 | |
| 8 |
|
15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 22 | |
| 9 |
|
15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 20 | |
| 10 |
|
15 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 30 | 27 | +3 | 17 | |
| 11 |
|
15 | 5 | 1 | 9 | 25 | 24 | +1 | 16 | |
| 12 |
|
14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 16 | 20 | -4 | 16 | |
| 13 |
|
14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 28 | -6 | 14 | |
| 14 |
|
15 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 19 | 31 | -12 | 14 | |
| 15 |
|
14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 14 | 36 | -22 | 11 |
| Points/Game | 1 |
| Win % | 20% |
| Goals/Game | 4 |
| Scored Avg | 1.8 |
| Conceded Avg | 2.2 |
| BTTS | 100% |
| Clean Sheets | 0% |
| Failed to Score | 0% |
| Points/Game | 0.2 |
| Win % | 0% |
| Goals/Game | 3.6 |
| Scored Avg | 1.2 |
| Conceded Avg | 2.4 |
| BTTS | 100% |
| Clean Sheets | 0% |
| Failed to Score | 0% |
| Points/Game | 0.6 |
| Win % | 0% |
| Goals/Game | 4.6 |
| Scored Avg | 2 |
| Conceded Avg | 2.6 |
| BTTS | 100% |
| Clean Sheets | 0% |
| Failed to Score | 0% |
| Points/Game | 0.6 |
| Win % | 20% |
| Goals/Game | 3.2 |
| Scored Avg | 1 |
| Conceded Avg | 2.2 |
| BTTS | 60% |
| Clean Sheets | 20% |
| Failed to Score | 20% |
| Points/Game | 1.9 |
| Win % | 60% |
| Goals/Game | 3.6 |
| Scored Avg | 2.2 |
| Conceded Avg | 1.4 |
| BTTS | 70% |
| Clean Sheets | 30% |
| Failed to Score | 0% |
| Points/Game | 1.8 |
| Win % | 60% |
| Goals/Game | 3.6 |
| Scored Avg | 2 |
| Conceded Avg | 1.6 |
| BTTS | 80% |
| Clean Sheets | 20% |
| Failed to Score | 0% |
| Points/Game | 1.2 |
| Win % | 40% |
| Goals/Game | 4 |
| Scored Avg | 2.2 |
| Conceded Avg | 1.8 |
| BTTS | 80% |
| Clean Sheets | 20% |
| Failed to Score | 0% |
| Points/Game | 2.6 |
| Win % | 80% |
| Goals/Game | 3.6 |
| Scored Avg | 2.4 |
| Conceded Avg | 1.2 |
| BTTS | 80% |
| Clean Sheets | 20% |
| Failed to Score | 0% |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Matches | 20 |
| Average Goals | 3.3 |
| BTTS | 80% |
| Over 2.5 Goals | 80% |
| Over 1.5 Goals | 90% |
| Team | Total | Average |
|---|---|---|
| Toronto FC | 36 | 1.8 per game |
| Chicago Fire | 30 | 1.5 per game |
| Team | Clean Sheets |
|---|---|
| Toronto FC | 2 (10%) |
| Chicago Fire | 3 (15%) |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Matches | 20 |
| Average Goals | 3.3 |
| BTTS | 80% |
| Over 2.5 Goals | 80% |
| Over 1.5 Goals | 90% |
| Team | Total | Average |
|---|---|---|
| Toronto FC | 36 | 1.8 per game |
| Chicago Fire | 30 | 1.5 per game |
| Team | Clean Sheets |
|---|---|
| Toronto FC | 2 (10%) |
| Chicago Fire | 3 (15%) |
YOU MUST BE 18+ TO BET. Gambling involves risk and can be addictive. Please gamble responsibly and only bet what you can afford to lose.
Our football predictions are based on statistical analysis and should be used for entertainment purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
We are not licensed financial or gambling advisors. Always consult professional advice before making betting decisions.