Yesterday’s Predictions Review: Wednesday, 4 Nov 2026
Yesterday’s predictions review covered a busy slate of 45 fixtures, with the forecasts delivering a balanced and encouraging return across the main betting markets. The 1X2 predictions were correct in 27 of 45 matches, producing an accuracy rate of 60%. That performance shows how the review handled a large and varied set of football scenarios without relying on a single narrow trend.
The Over/Under predictions also reached 27 correct outcomes from 45, matching the 60% rate recorded for 1X2. BTTS finished slightly lower, with 26 correct predictions out of 45 and an accuracy of 58%, though it remained above the halfway mark. Across all three markets, the day brought a mixture of successful calls and notable misses, with the overall figures providing a useful snapshot of the review’s consistency and the competitive nature of yesterday’s football schedule.
Our Pick Accuracy: Solid, but Not Consistent
Across 45 matches, the highest-confidence Our Pick produced an accuracy rate of 60% for 1X2 and 60% for Over/Under. The identical rates show that the strongest selections were equally effective in identifying match winners and total-goal outcomes. A 27/45 record in both categories indicates a respectable overall record, although the short-term nature of football predictions means that 60% should be treated as a positive benchmark rather than proof of a consistently reliable edge.
The BTTS market was slightly less successful at 58%, with 26 correct selections from 45. That two-point gap behind both 1X2 and Over/Under suggests that combining these markets added a small degree of uncertainty when the chosen prediction required both teams to score. It remains a competitive hit rate, but the results indicate that the most confident BTTS picks were not quite as dependable as the leading selections in the other two categories.
Overall, the review records 27 correct 1X2 picks, 27 correct Over/Under picks and 26 correct BTTS picks. These are credible results, but they also highlight where caution matters: the strategy performed well over this sample, while the modest decline in BTTS accuracy shows that not every equally high-confidence prediction carried the same probability of success. The figures support continued use of the approach while keeping expectations realistic and avoiding any claim of exceptional consistency.
Five Best Prediction Calls
Our standout calls combined conviction with accuracy across competitive UEFA Champions League league-phase fixtures. AEK Athens FC’s 2-3 defeat to Real Madrid produced the strongest call of the five, with an Away Win prediction at 78% proving correct. The forecast showed clear confidence in Real Madrid to secure the three points, and the one-goal margin validated that assessment. Fenerbahçe’s 3-2 win over Liverpool also landed from an Away Win selection made at 65%. In a close, high-scoring contest, correctly identifying the winning side required a decisive reading rather than a cautious expectation of a draw. PSV Eindhoven’s 1-2 loss to Club Brugge was another successful call: the Home Win prediction at 50% delivered a valuable result despite carrying less certainty than the Real Madrid and Fenerbahçe selections.
The remaining two successes offered different analytical value. Borussia Dortmund’s 2-1 victory over Real Betis matched our Home Win call at 57%, and the one-goal margin demonstrated why a measured probability can be more useful than an overstated one. A prediction does not need to claim overwhelming superiority to be valuable when it identifies the correct outcome in a tight match. Lens versus Como delivered the most emphatic result of the group, with Lens losing 1-9 and our Away Win call at 50% proving correct. Although the prediction carried only moderate confidence, recognizing Club Brugge… no, Como as the winning side produced the largest winning margin among these five correct calls.
Where the biggest predictions went wrong
The clearest miss was Somaspor 0-0 Sebat Gençlikspor, where the forecast assigned a 50% probability to a home win. That selection failed to account for the possibility of a match with no goals, and the final draw exposed an overconfident home-favoring assumption. A 0-0 result means neither side found a winning route, so the prediction needed to allow more space for the draw rather than treating it as a secondary outcome.
The RSC Anderlecht II 1-0 K. Lierse S.K. entry is more complicated because the listed score shows RSC Anderlecht II winning at home, while the prediction is marked as wrong. The score itself therefore does not support the claim that the home side failed to win. This should be treated as a grading or recording issue rather than evidence that the forecast was directionally wrong. The 42% home-win probability may have been too cautious, but it did not prevent the predicted outcome from matching the score.
Taken together, the two misses show why forecast review cannot rely only on the result label. Somaspor was a genuine outcome error: the home-win prediction was not reflected in the 0-0 score. Anderlecht II produced the opposite situation, with the home team winning 1-0 despite being listed as incorrect. The honest lesson is to separate result accuracy from probability calibration and to flag any entry where the recorded score contradicts the stated prediction mistake.
Results Roundup: Champions League Delivers Two Correct Calls
UEFA Champions League: The Group Stage produced a notable 9-1 victory for Como over Lens, while Real Madrid edged AEK Athens FC 3-2. Both selections were correct. Club Brugge KV also claimed a 2-1 win against PSV Eindhoven, but the prediction was wrong. Fenerbahçe’s 3-2 defeat to Liverpool likewise produced an incorrect 1X2 selection. The Champions League results combined two major wins with two surprises, making the competition the standout part of the roundup.
UEFA Europa League: Rennes and Olympiakos Piraeus finished their League Stage - 4 fixture 0-0, but the 1X2 prediction was wrong. In the Türkiye Kupası Quarter-finals, Eyüpspor defeated Fethiyespor 4-2 to register a correct selection.
Across the Championship, Wrexham beat Middlesbrough 2-0 and Cardiff City drew 3-3 with West Ham, with both predictions wrong. Bristol City’s 1-2 loss to Wolves was correctly assessed. The Pro League saw Kortrijk lose 3-1 to KV Mechelen, although the prediction was wrong, while Ligue 1 leaders MC Alger recorded a correct selection by beating MC Oran 2-0.
Conclusion
Yesterday’s Results review for Wednesday, 4 Nov 2026 covered 45 matches and achieved a 1X2 accuracy of 60%. The figure indicates that the prediction set found the correct outcome in a clear majority of the selections reviewed.
Overall, the results provide a positive assessment of the forecasting approach, with accuracy remaining the central measure of performance across yesterday’s 45 games.