Saturday, 14 Nov 2026: Yesterday's Results Review
Yesterday's Results brought a demanding slate of 155 fixtures, with the review recording 94 correct 1X2 predictions for an accuracy of 61%. That performance provided a solid foundation across the day's football schedule, although the margin also showed that no single market offered complete certainty. The predictions successfully navigated a mix of outcomes and demonstrated useful consistency across a large sample of matches.
The Over/Under market delivered 91 correct selections from 154 settled predictions, producing a 59% accuracy rate. BTTS was the most demanding of the three categories, but 87 correct picks from 155 still represented a 56% return. Taken together, these results illustrate the drama and variability involved in reviewing a full day of football. Strong market coverage was achieved, yet the figures also reinforce the value of disciplined selection, careful comparison of available signals, and accepting that even well-researched football predictions can be overturned by the realities of matchday action.
Prediction Accuracy: 1X2 Leads the Record
The highest-confidence “Our Pick” produced a 1X2 record of 94 correct outcomes from 155 matches, an accuracy rate of 61%. This was the strongest of the three markets, although a 94-match return still means that 61 selections were not converted into a correct result. The advantage of 1X2 therefore lies in consistency rather than perfect accuracy: it outpaced both Over/Under and BTTS across the review.
Over/Under finished at 91 correct from 154 rated matches, or 59%, with 63 unsuccessful selections. That total is close to the 1X2 rate, but it came from one fewer match and offers slightly less evidence. The denominator matters when judging the result: the Over/Under accuracy applies to 154 matches, while the overall review contains 155.
BTTS was the weakest category at 87 correct from 155 matches, equating to 56%. Its 68 incorrect selections show that “Both Teams to Score” was the least reliable of the leading tips, despite remaining successful in more than half of the cases. Overall, the figures indicate that 1X2 was the best-performing market, Over/Under sat just behind, and BTTS offered the greatest scope for improvement.
Five Correct Calls Across the Nations League
The clearest success was Norway’s 3-1 win over Wales in UEFA Nations League, League A - 5. The Home Win prediction at 76% was correct and carried the highest confidence among the five selections, making it a strong forecast on both outcome and probability. Hungary’s 2-0 victory over Georgia in League B - 5 was equally valuable because the Away Win call at 40% succeeded from a comparatively lower confidence level.
Northern Ireland’s 1-0 win over Ukraine in UEFA Nations League, League B - 5, delivered another demanding correct selection. The Home Win prediction at 39% was the least confident call in this group, yet the one-goal margin and clean sheet provided a decisive result. Austria also backed a narrow margin to land, with its 1-0 victory over Rep. Of Ireland in League B - 5 confirming the 60% Home Win forecast.
Portugal 1-4 Denmark in UEFA Nations League, League A - 5, rounded out the successful set. The 60% Home Win prediction was correct despite the unusual scoreline, while the four-goal margin and three Danish goals made it the most emphatic result among these calls. Across both League A - 5 and League B - 5, all five predictions were right, including two achieved at 40% or below—highlighting the value of correctly identifying outcomes beyond the safest-looking selections.
Our Biggest Prediction Misses
Our five largest misses all came from overconfident home or away calls that failed to account for the match’s actual balance. APS Bomet were given a 39% home-win prediction but lost 2-1 to Bandari, while Erbaaspor were assessed at 45% to beat Elazığspor, only for the teams to finish 0-0. In both cases, the forecast treated one team’s nominal advantage as more decisive than the evidence justified. The draw was especially clear against the Erbaaspor selection, which had the highest percentage among the five misses.
Temperley offered another example of a home prediction that did not withstand the result. They were assigned a 51% chance to beat Ciudad de Bolívar, but the 1-2 scoreline reversed the forecast. Confidence above 50% may appear strong in isolation, yet it did not translate into a correct match assessment. The same issue shaped the Waalwijk call: a 48% home prediction was wrong despite the home side’s 4-0 victory, showing how a result-based review can identify logical inconsistencies in how predictions are recorded and communicated.
Carlisle 2-0 Boston United requires particular care. Although this prediction is listed as a miss, the scoreline shows Carlisle, the home team, winning. On the result alone, the Home Win prediction was correct, so its inclusion as a “wrong” prediction conflicts with the supplied score. We have retained it here because it appears among the identified misses, but the underlying data needs correction. The genuine lesson from the other four results is straightforward: single outcomes assigned probabilities of 39%, 45%, 51% and 48% were too assertive when the matches demonstrated greater uncertainty.
Results Roundup: Domestic and International Leagues
The UEFA Nations League supplied four competitive fixtures from League B - 5 and League A - 5. Georgia’s 0-2 defeat to Hungary and Norway’s 3-1 victory over Wales were the two correct 1X2 selections, while Kosovo’s 0-0 draw with Israel and Romania’s 2-1 win over Poland both went wrong. The scoreless Nations League contest was the only match among these four without a goal.
Across the domestic competitions, FKF Premier League leaders APS Bomet beat Bandari 2-1 for a correct selection, although Ulinzi Stars’ 1-1 draw with Migori Youth was unsuccessful. In Ghana’s Premier League, Dreams secured a 2-1 win against Heart of Lions, but that result also missed the predicted 1X2 outcome. Canon’s 2-1 victory over Unisport Bafang in Elite One and Livyi Bereh’s 0-3 loss to Bukovyna in the Ukrainian Premier League completed the round-up of selections.
Turkey’s 2. Lig produced the strongest return, with three correct predictions from four matches. Muş Sport Klübü beat Güzide Gebzespor 2-0, Şanlıurfaspor won 6-1 against Kastamonuspor, and Kahramanmaraş İstiklal Spor defeated Fethiyespor 5-1. Only the 0-0 draw between İnegöl Kafkas Gençlik and Çorluspor 1947 was incorrect. Overall, seven of the 13 listed results were called correctly, including all three Turkish wins.
Conclusion
Yesterday’s Results predictions review covered 155 matches on Saturday, 14 Nov 2026, delivering 61% accuracy on 1X2 selections. This represents a strong return across the full slate and provides a useful benchmark for evaluating the predictions model.