Predictions

Bet Types

Leagues

Teams

Accumulator Tips Bet of the Day Articles Favorites Leaderboard

English

Settings

Odds Format
Example: 2.50
Timezone
Join us on Telegram
Zambia

Super League

Predictions & Betting Tips

Season 2025/26
Teams 18
304 / 306 matches played 100%

Super League Predictions

No upcoming matches for this period

League Facts

Mines have lost their last 4 league matches
NAPSA Stars have kept 3 consecutive clean sheets
Power Dynamos scored in the first half in 13 of their last 15 matches (87%)
Mutondo Stars have won just 0 of 17 away matches this season
Prison Leopards have won just 0 of 17 away matches this season
Kabwe Warriors have kept 12 clean sheets in 17 home games (71%)
Nkwazi failed to score in 17 of 34 matches (50%)
Red Arrows win 82% at home but just 18% away — a stark contrast
Mufulira Wanderers failed to score in 17 of 34 matches (50%)
Power Dynamos have kept 20 clean sheets in 34 matches (59%)
Mines have won just 1 of 17 away matches this season
Under 2.5 goals in 14 of Mufulira Wanderers's last 15 matches (93%)

Prediction Accuracy

147
Matches Analyzed
74%
Best: Double Chance
62%
Overall Accuracy

Season Betting Insights 304 matches

Match Result
Home
43%
Draw
32%
Away
24%
Total Goals
Avg: 1.74 goals/match
Over 1.5
53%
Over 2.5
23%
Over 3.5
7%
Both Teams Score
36%Yes
64%No
Double Chance
1X
76%
X2
57%
12
68%
Asian Handicap
Avg Goal Diff: +0.36
79%Close (0-1)
21%Win by 2+
Half Time
Home
35%
Draw
50%
Away
16%
HT/FT
1 1/1
29%
2 X/X
23%
3 X/1
14%
4 2/2
12%
5 X/2
12%
Correct Score
1 1-0
20%
2 1-1
17%
3 0-0
13%
4 0-1
13%
5 2-0
11%

Super League Standings

# Team P W D L GF GA GD Pts Form
1 Power Dynamos 34 23 9 2 53 18 +35 78
2 Red Arrows 34 17 12 5 44 22 +22 63
3 Man Utd Zambia Academy 34 14 9 11 35 30 +5 51
4 Kabwe Warriors 34 14 9 11 30 25 +5 51
5 Nchanga Rangers 34 14 8 12 31 26 +5 50
6 Green Eagles 34 13 11 10 29 25 +4 50
7 Zanaco 34 14 8 12 30 30 0 50
8 Mufulira Wanderers 34 14 7 13 22 25 -3 49
9 Konkola Blades 34 11 15 8 32 28 +4 48
10 ZESCO United 34 13 8 13 39 30 +9 47
11 Kansanshi Dynamos 34 10 13 11 28 26 +2 43
12 Green Buffaloes 34 9 14 11 27 34 -7 41
13 Nkana 34 9 12 13 23 30 -7 39
14 Nkwazi 34 8 13 13 21 28 -7 37
15 NAPSA Stars 34 8 12 14 25 33 -8 36
16 Mutondo Stars 34 7 14 13 23 34 -11 35
17 Prison Leopards 34 7 13 14 25 37 -12 34
18 Mines 34 3 9 22 19 55 -36 18

Past Predictions

Season Statistics

304
Matches
530
Total Goals
1.74
Avg Goals
7
Most in a Match
53
0-15'
106
16-30'
106
31-45'
106
46-60'
106
61-75'
0
76-90'
53
91-105'
0 Yellow Cards
0 Red Cards
0 cards per match (0 yellow)
Stats available soon
Clean Sheets194
0-0 Draws41
Home Goals320
Away Goals210

Expert League Analysis

Alexey Andrianov
Founder & Lead Analyst
60.3% Accuracy
30+ Years Experience
16,179 Predictions

Power Dynamos Reign Supreme as Zambia's Super League 2025/26 Delivers Drama at Both Ends

The curtain fell on the Zambia Super League 2025/26 season with Power Dynamos standing triumphant at the summit, their name etched into the history books as champions for the campaign. Across 304 matches played, the league produced 530 goals at an average of 1.74 per game, with home sides contributing 320 of those strikes compared to 210 from visiting teams. The statistics painted a familiar picture of Zambian football's home advantage, yet beneath the aggregate numbers lay a tapestry of fierce battles, surprising reversals, and clubs fighting desperately against the tide.

The title race, once viewed as a two-horse contest at the campaign's midpoint, saw Power Dynamos emerge with enough poise and consistency to hold off any late challengers. Their march to the championship was not merely about accumulating points but about demonstrating the kind of resilience that separates champions from pretenders. While the identity of their closest pursuers became clear as the season unfolded, Power Dynamos managed the pressure of the run-in with the authority expected of a side harboring ambitions of domestic dominance.

At the opposite end of the table, the stakes could not have been higher. Mutondo Stars, Prison Leopards, and Mines found themselves condemned to the drop zone, their seasons ending in disappointment as the relegation battle claimed its victims. These three clubs now face an uncertain future as they prepare for life outside the top flight, their campaigns defined by struggles that ultimately fell short of the survival threshold. The gulf between survival and the abyss measured in points that proved impossible to bridge when it mattered most.

The 2025/26 Super League season delivered its verdict with finality. Power Dynamos celebrated at the top while three clubs began the painful process of regrouping after their demotions. For the neutrals, the campaign offered the compelling mixture of excellence and desperation that makes league football so compelling, a drama played out across thirty-four matchdays where every result carried the weight of consequence.

Power Dynamos' Commanding Championship Victory

The 2025/26 Super League season concluded with Power Dynamos delivering a masterclass of consistency that left their rivals in the shade from the opening exchanges through to the final whistle. The club accumulated 78 points across 34 matches, winning 23 encounters while suffering just two defeats - a record that underscored their tactical discipline and squad depth throughout the campaign. What separated Power Dynamos from the pack was not merely their win count but their ability to collect points when performances faltered, as evidenced by nine draws that kept rivals at bay during testing periods.

The gap to second-placed Red Arrows stood at a commanding 15 points, a margin that reflected how thoroughly Power Dynamos dominated the season. Red Arrows finished with 63 points, respectable by most standards yet ultimately insufficient to mount a sustained challenge. Behind them, Man Utd Zambia Academy and Kabwe Warriors both reached 51 points, while Nchanga Rangers pushed to 50 - a tight cluster separated by minimal margins that spoke to competitive intensity among the chasing pack, though none possessed the firepower to threaten the summit. The form guide heading into the closing stages showed Power Dynamos in resolute mood with a WWDDW sequence that prevented any late flutter in the title race.

Power Dynamos' championship was built on defensive solidity and ruthlessness in front of goal, converting their statistical advantages into unassailable leads at the top of the table. Their two losses across the entire season demonstrated remarkable resilience, suggesting opponents struggled not only to beat them but to even earn victories against a side that rarely capitulated. For the chasing teams, the season exposed the distance between aspiration and achievement, with Red Arrows, the Academy side, Kabwe Warriors and Nchanga Rangers fighting fiercely for the remaining European qualification berths while the championship destination was settled well before the campaign's conclusion.

As the season reached its conclusion, the standings painted a clear hierarchy: Power Dynamos stood alone at the summit, an impressive 27 points clear of the clubs scrapping for third and fourth positions. The race for European places proved far more engaging than the title battle itself, with Man Utd Zambia Academy, Kabwe Warriors and Nchanga Rangers separated by a single point, creating genuine drama in the battle for continental qualification. At the opposite end of the table, Mutondo Stars, Prison Leopards and Mines completed the campaign in the bottom three positions, their seasons defined by struggles that ultimately ended in relegation.

The Fight for Survival: Three Clubs Face the Drop

The closing weeks of the campaign delivered heartbreak for three clubs as Mutondo Stars, Prison Leopards and Mines completed the season in the relegation positions, bringing their top-flight tenure to an end. The battle to avoid the bottom three unfolded across the entire season, with five clubs entering the final stretch separated by just 19 points. Each result carried immense consequence, and the compressed nature of the lower table meant that momentum swings could prove catastrophic or salvation-saving in the space of a single matchday.

Nkwazi and NAPSA Stars managed to extract themselves from the danger zone when it mattered most. Nkwazi finished with 37 points courtesy of eight wins and thirteen draws from their thirty-four matches, their final sequence of results reading LWWDL providing just enough momentum to keep clear of trouble. NAPSA Stars followed close behind on 36 points with a WDWLD run in their closing fixtures that proved decisive, their twelve draws illustrating a campaign plagued by an inability to turn tight encounters into victories. Both clubs survived by the narrowest of margins, their fates sealed not through commanding runs but through the failures of those below them to capitalise.

Mines endured a campaign that unravelled from the outset, their 18-point tally representing a catastrophic decline that left them without hope of recovery long before the season concluded. With only three victories and nine draws across 34 matches, they accumulated the fewest points by an enormous margin. Their form guide of WLLLL offered brief respite before each relapse, but the numbers told an irreversible story. Mutondo Stars and Prison Leopards, despite gathering 35 and 34 points respectively, found themselves paired with Mines in the final standings, their seasons defined by inconsistency at the worst possible moments.

The gulf between survival and relegation measured merely two points, yet that gap separated elation from devastation for the clubs involved. Mutondo Stars dropped from safety having drawn fourteen matches, a record that underscored their inability to convert promising situations into precious victories. Prison Leopards matched them with seven wins and thirteen draws, their WWLLD sequence arriving too late to alter their fate. For these three clubs, the season ended not with dramatic final-day drama but with the quiet certainty of a campaign that slipped away match by match, leaving them to plan for life in the division below.

European Qualification Battle

While Power Dynamos had already secured the championship and three clubs prepared for life in the lower division, the race for continental representation provided compelling drama as the season reached its conclusion. Five clubs entered the final phase separated by the narrowest of margins, with just two points separating fourth place from eighth place in what became a fascinating contest for Zambia's Confederation Cup berths.

Kabwe Warriors emerged as the team that handled the pressure most effectively, accumulating 51 points to claim fourth position and the most advantageous standing for potential European qualification. Their closing sequence of results, recorded as LDLDW, demonstrated the resilience required to hold off determined challengers. Directly behind them, Nchanga Rangers, Green Eagles and Zanaco found themselves locked together on 50 points each, creating a remarkable three-way tie that ensured the final order remained uncertain until the very last matches were completed.

Mufulira Wanderers occupied eighth position with 49 points, falling just one point short of the qualification picture despite their best efforts throughout the campaign. Their final form guide of LDLLW illustrated the difficulty of breaking into the upper reaches when so many clubs remained separated by minimal margins. The five-team group that contested these positions showcased the depth of quality across the Super League, with position changes possible on virtually any matchday until the campaign reached its definitive conclusion.

Clinical Finishers and Championship-Winning Firepower

The 2025/26 Zambia Super League season concluded with Power Dynamos securing the title, and their championship charge was built on a foundation of ruthless efficiency in the final third. Across the full 304-match campaign, the league showcased a diverse range of attacking talents, with several players emerging as the primary goal threats for their respective clubs. The champions themselves demonstrated remarkable consistency in front of goal, translating their dominant league position into a decisive title triumph that saw them finish well ahead of the chasing pack.

Beyond the individual goal tallies, the season highlighted the importance of having multiple attacking options within a squad. Teams that featured consistent goal contributors throughout the campaign positioned themselves favorably in the final standings, while clubs that relied too heavily on a single striker often struggled when that player was unavailable or marked out of games. The best performers in the league combined technical quality with the clinical edge required at this level, converting their chances at rates that separated them from the rest of the pack.

The relegated clubs, including Mutondo Stars, Prison Leopards, and Mines, found goals difficult to come by throughout the season. Their struggles in the final third directly contributed to their position at the bottom of the table, highlighting how crucial attacking output is to survival in the Super League. Conversely, those who qualified for continental competition through their league position generally possessed the most potent attacks in the division, underscoring the correlation between goal-scoring ability and overall success in Zambian football's top tier.

Tactical Patterns and Statistical Trends in the 2025/26 Season

The Zambia Super League 2025/26 season painted a compelling picture of home dominance, with the 320 goals scored by home sides substantially outpacing the 210 netted by visiting teams across 304 completed matches. This 110-goal differential reflected a league where familiar surroundings and partisan crowds continued to shape outcomes significantly. The away Goal ratio of approximately 0.69 per match suggested that travelling sides faced considerable tactical challenges in breaking down organized home defenses, potentially indicating that many clubs prioritized defensive solidity when playing outside their own venues rather than pursuing aggressive attacking strategies.

Defensive discipline defined the campaign, as evidenced by the 194 clean sheets recorded across the season. This equated to a clean sheet in nearly two-thirds of all matches, underscoring how goalkeepers and backlines exerted enormous influence on final standings. The prevalence of shutouts dovetailed with the 41 goalless draws scattered throughout the fixture list, highlighting a pattern of cautious, low-risk football that prioritized denying opponents over creating chances. For those monitoring Over/Under markets or clean sheet-related betting angles, this season demonstrated that backing defenses often proved more profitable than expecting high-scoring spectacles.

The statistical landscape shaped by these trends offered clear separation between contenders and those facing the drop. Champions Power Dynamos combined home solidity with meaningful away returns to accumulate decisive points, while the bottom three clubs, including Mutondo Stars, Prison Leopards and Mines, struggled to keep pace largely due to their inability to grind out results in difficult circumstances. The gulf between the top performers and the relegation zone reflected not just quality gaps but also differing approaches to the fundamental tactical question of how best to win matches when the odds were stacked against you.

Low-Scoring League Favours Defensive Bettors

The 2025/26 Super League campaign confirmed itself as one of the most conservative goal-producing competitions in recent memory, with an average of just 1.74 goals per match across the full 304 fixtures. This figure painted a clear picture for bettors who prioritised the Under market throughout the season. The Over 1.5 threshold cleared in only 53% of matches, sitting marginally above the break-even line, while the Over 2.5 trigger landed in a mere 23% of encounters — a figure that made backing the Over at standard odds a consistently loss-making position for those who backed it universally.

The Over 3.5 outcome proved almost negligible as a betting proposition, returning just 7% of matches, which translated to roughly 21 matches across the entire campaign where three or more goals were registered. This ultra-low frequency made any investment in Over 3.5 targets an exceptionally high-risk venture. Meanwhile, the BTTS market told a similarly cautious story, with both teams scoring together in only 36% of fixtures, leaving the No option to land in 64% of games — a comfortable majority that rewarded those who backed defensive solidity and clean sheets as the default expectation rather than the exception.

What emerges from these numbers is a league where goal scarcity defined the narrative from opening whistle to final whistle. Power Dynamos claimed the title not through free-scoring attacking play but through grinding out narrow victories and hard-fought points. The three clubs occupying the bottom positions — Mutondo Stars, Prison Leopards and Mines — found the net at such a sparse rate that their struggles were as much about attacking impotence as defensive vulnerability. For bettors approaching Super League markets in future seasons, the data argues persuasively for Under 2.5 positions and BTTS No selections as the default starting point, with the burden of proof resting firmly on those seeking the Over.

Super League 2025/26 Betting Market Analysis

The Zambia Super League 2025/26 season reached its conclusion with 304 matches played across the full campaign, providing a comprehensive dataset for market analysis. The outright picture saw Power Dynamos lift the title, while Mutondo Stars, Prison Leopards and Mines occupied the bottom three positions in the final standings. These outcomes aligned with the season-long patterns embedded within the betting markets.

The 1X2 full-time market reflected a league where home advantage held meaningful weight. Home victories accounted for 43 percent of results, draws settled at 32 percent and away wins comprised 24 percent. The double chance market reinforced this distribution, with 1X covering 76 percent of matches, X2 capturing 57 percent and the avoid-the-draw 12 market hitting 68 percent. For bettors seeking higher odds, the away-win segment represented genuine value given its sub-25 percent strike rate.

Asian Handicap analysis revealed a modestly positive home bias. The average goal differential of 0.36 in favour of home sides indicated tight contests on balance. Home teams winning by two goals or more occurred in just 21 percent of fixtures, underscoring the competitive nature of the league and suggesting that theAH line rarely stretched bettors into excessive liability on the favourites. The half-time market proved particularly draw-heavy, with 50 percent of matches deadlock at the interval, while home teams led at the break in 35 percent of cases against a mere 16 percent for away sides.

Correct score patterns confirmed the season's low-scoring character. The 1-0 home win led all outcomes at 20 percent, with 1-1 draws at 17 percent and goalless stalemates at 13 percent. The 0-1 away win matched the 0-0 frequency at 13 percent, and the 2-0 home victory rounded out the top five at 11 percent. These figures painted a clear picture for Under markets and suggested that punters backing home wins in the correct score market found their best value in the narrow 1-0 and 2-0 brackets rather than targeting higher-scoring scenarios.

How the Bookmakers Fared: A Season of Hard Calls in the Super League

The 2025/26 Zambian Super League campaign tested every forecasting model brought to bear upon it, with the overall accuracy rate of 62 percent across 147 matches painting a picture of a competition that refused to yield to conventional wisdom. Power Dynamos ultimately claimed the championship, finishing clear at the summit, while Mines, Prison Leopards and Mutondo Stars occupied the bottom three positions and faced the consequences of a campaign that eluded their grasp at critical moments throughout the year. The aggregate figure masked significant variance between markets, however, and those who navigated the season's complexities through the right channels found considerably more success than the headline number suggested.

Double Chance emerged as the standout market for anyone seeking reliable returns, delivering a 74 percent strike rate from 147 predictions and proving that simplifying the question of outright victory or draw produced substantially better outcomes than attempting to pinpoint exact results. Over/Under selections performed strongly at 71 percent, reflecting a league where scoring patterns showed enough consistency to exploit through disciplined positioning. Half-Time Result predictions also outperformed the overall average at 63 percent, indicating that the first forty-five minutes of matches often followed more predictable scripts than the full ninety. The Both Teams to Score market hit at 59 percent, a respectable return that nonetheless lagged behind the more binary questions posed by Over/Under and Double Chance approaches.

The harder markets proved exactly that — harder. Match Result predictions at 46 percent demonstrated the inherent difficulty in calling outright winners in a league where home advantage fluctuated and surprise outcomes arrived with regularity. Asian Handicap selections returned only 45 percent from a smaller sample of 40 matches, underscoring how the line betting required precision that the season rarely provided. Perhaps most humbling was the Half-Time / Full-Time market, which yielded just 18 percent accuracy, with only 8 of 45 predictions proven correct — a stark reminder that predicting the precise trajectory of a ninety-minute contest demands far more certainty than this particular campaign offered. Correct Score predictions proved equally punishing at 11 percent, confirming that the granular approach, however appealing in theory, bore little fruit against the unpredictable nature of the Super League. The lesson from the season was clear: those who kept their forecasting simple and resisted the temptation to overcomplicate their selections found the most sustainable returns.

The Dramatic Moments That Defined Zambia's Super League Season

The 2025/26 Super League campaign delivered its share of unexpected twists, none more intriguing than ZESCO United's curious home form against teams fighting for survival. When ZESCO United played out a 1-1 draw with Prison Leopards on April 29, it represented a significant upset given that the home victory had carried 62% confidence in the betting markets. Prison Leopards, ultimately condemned to 17th place and relegation alongside Mutondo Stars and Mines, emerged from that encounter with a valuable point that proved crucial in the context of their ultimately unsuccessful battle against the drop.

ZESCO United's propensity for surprising results extended beyond that fixture. Just six days later, on April 23, they were held to another 1-1 draw by NAPSA Stars despite a 57% probability favouring a home win. These consecutive stumbles against mid-table and lower-table opposition painted a picture of inconsistency that would have frustrated the club's supporters throughout the campaign. The pattern raised questions about ZESCO United's concentration levels when facing opponents with less to play for, a common dynamic in football leagues where the title race and European qualification slots capture the majority of attention.

In stark contrast to those frustrating draws, ZESCO United produced a spectacular attacking display on May 24 when they demolished Zanaco 6-1 in a result that immediately caught the attention of followers across the division. With seven goals shared between the sides, it represented everything exciting about the Super League at its most entertaining. The goal-fest provided a reminder of the destructive potential within ZESCO United's forward line, suggesting that when conditions align, they remain capable of overwhelming any opponent on their day. Earlier in the campaign, Kansanshi Dynamos had also contributed to the season's most memorable encounters, edging past NAPSA Stars 3-2 in a five-goal thriller on April 1.

While the season has now concluded with Power Dynamos confirmed as champions and the three relegation spots filled by Mutondo Stars, Prison Leopards and Mines, these high-scoring fixtures and surprise results linger in the memory as defining moments. The Super League's reputation for unpredictability was upheld throughout the campaign, with even mathematically secure sides capable of producing breathtaking performances or unexpected slip-ups depending on circumstance and motivation. For supporters and analysts alike, the 2025/26 season demonstrated that no result should be taken for granted in Zambia's top flight.

2025/26 Super League Betting Review

The completed 2025/26 Zambian Super League campaign offered bettors a compelling narrative from opening whistle to final whistle, with Power Dynamos' title triumph providing the season's defining backbone. Across the full 304-match programme, the dynamics between established contenders and relegation-threatened sides created distinct patterns worthy of examination for future betting angles. Understanding how markets priced these outcomes—and where value emerged—sets the foundation for analysing the season's betting landscape with the benefit of hindsight.

Home advantage proved a consistent feature throughout the campaign, with clubs able to leverage familiar conditions and crowd support to extract maximum returns. The relegation battle involving Mutondo Stars, Prison Leopards and Mines shaped the lower reaches of the table from the early stages, meaning matches involving these sides frequently offered Over/Under opportunities as pressure manifested in tactical approaches. Clean sheet percentages varied considerably between top-flight finishers and those fighting for survival, creating discernible patterns in both teams to score markets that rewarded careful analysis of squad depth and defensive organisation.

Looking forward to subsequent campaigns, the Zambia Super League rewards bettors who track squad turnover carefully and monitor pre-season friendlies for early indicators of managerial philosophy. The gap between the division's upper and lower tiers remained apparent throughout, suggesting that Asian Handicap markets frequently offered value when backing stronger sides against bottom-half opponents. Bookmaker odds adjustments after initial lines often overcorrected for single results, creating exploitable pricing inefficiencies in subsequent fixtures. The 2025/26 season demonstrated that patient, data-informed approaches—rather than reactive betting—delivered the most sustainable returns across the full fixture list.

Frequently Asked Questions — Super League 2025/26

Who clinched the Super League title this season?

Power Dynamos finished 15 points clear at the summit, accumulating 78 points across their 34 matches with a record of 23 wins, 9 draws and just 2 defeats. Red Arrows settled for second place on 63 points, while Man Utd Zambia Academy and Kabwe Warriors both finished level on 51 points, with Nchanga Rangers completing the top five on 50 points.

What was the typical goal output per match in the Super League?

The 2025/26 season produced 530 goals across 304 matches, translating to an average of 1.74 goals per game. Home sides contributed 320 goals compared to 210 scored by away teams, indicating a noticeable home advantage throughout the campaign.

How did Over/Under and Both Teams to Score markets perform?

Over 2.5 goals landed in just 23% of matches, making it a notably low-scoring campaign by league standards. Over 1.5 goals proved more common at 53%, while BTTS Yes reached 36% of fixtures, with the majority of matches (64%) ending with at least one side failing to score.

Which clubs suffered relegation this season?

Mines, Prison Leopards and Mutondo Stars occupied the bottom three positions and were relegated from the Super League at the season's conclusion. The trio finished 18th, 17th and 16th respectively in the final standings.

How accurate were predictions for the Super League?

Across 147 analysed matches, the overall prediction accuracy reached 62%. The strongest performing market was Double Chance at 74%, followed by Over/Under at 71% and Half-Time Result at 63%. Match Result predictions achieved 46% accuracy, while Correct Score proved the most challenging at just 11%.

What betting approach worked best in this league?

The data suggests that conservative markets yielded the most reliable returns in the Super League. Double Chance and Over/Under selections both exceeded 70% accuracy, whereas trying to predict exact scorelines or Asian Handicaps produced significantly lower success rates of 11% and 45% respectively.

Super League predictions and betting tips for the 2025/26 season. Our AI analyses every Zambia football fixture across all 18 teams to deliver expert match predictions, correct score tips and over/under forecasts. This season, Super League averages 1.74 goals per game with 23% of matches going over 2.5 goals and 36% seeing both teams score. Get the latest Super League predictions today with odds analysis and confidence ratings.

Super League Predictions FAQ

How accurate are Super League predictions?

Our AI-powered Super League predictions achieve 62% accuracy across 147 analysed matches. We use advanced statistical models, team form data and real-time odds to generate reliable predictions.

What betting tips are available for Super League?

We provide Super League predictions for match result (1X2), correct score, over/under goals, both teams to score (BTTS), double chance, Asian handicap, half-time results, corners and cards. Each prediction includes confidence ratings and odds analysis.

What are the goal stats for Super League 2025/26?

Super League 2025/26 averages 1.74 goals per match across 304 games. 23% of matches go over 2.5 goals and 36% see both teams score. Use these trends to inform your over/under and BTTS betting.

Where can I find Super League correct score predictions?

You can find Super League correct score predictions by selecting the 'Correct Score' tab on this page. Our AI analyses historical scorelines, team attacking and defensive records to predict the most likely final scores for every match.

Do you cover all Super League matches?

Yes, we cover every Super League fixture across all 18 teams for the 2025/26 season. Predictions are available as soon as fixtures are confirmed and updated daily with the latest odds and team news.

Important Notice: Responsible Gambling & Predictions Disclaimer

18+

YOU MUST BE 18+ TO BET. Gambling involves risk and can be addictive. Please gamble responsibly and only bet what you can afford to lose.

Our football predictions are based on statistical analysis and should be used for entertainment purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

We are not licensed financial or gambling advisors. Always consult professional advice before making betting decisions.

18+Local responsible gambling resources — United Kingdom
Self-exclusion:GAMSTOP